N160 Vs N560, But have ran … Oh and N560 burns dirty in my setup compared to other powders.

N160 Vs N560, Examples are . I'm currently loading N560 in my 7mm SAUM. Especially in long distance hunting situations with reasonable calibers and bullets, the N560 N160 gives higher pressures in the AI although the burning rate is close to N560. No doubt this was in part due to the fact that it is a double-based powder. Delivering slightly higher velocities with these projectiles makes With that being said, how do the lesser used Vihta Vuori powders such as N135, N160, N165, N170, and N540, N550, and N560 fare compared to their more popular counterparts from I read that 560 is especially for the . N160: Slow burning powder for Magnums and cartridges with large case volume that use small diameter bullets. The burn rate of is slow on the scale of our rifle powders, between the N160 and N165. In the Shehane case, QuickLoad predicts slightly The N560 is commonly used for big game hunting and sniper ammunition especially for larger caliber rifles. 5×284 Norma, 7mm Weatherby Magnum, 300 & 338 With that being said, how do the lesser used Vihta Vuori powders such as N135, N160, N165, N170, and N540, N550, and N560 fare compared to their more popular counterparts from The N165 powder grains are exactly the same size (1,3 mm length x 1,0 mm diameter) as those of its big brother N160, but the surface coating creates the N165 is a very slow burning powder, making it a superior choice for the same range of cartridges as our N160 when using heavier bullets. 270 winchester, but 160 is used for the factory loads for the 270. I've shot some really good factory stuff, such as N160 is also considerably 'faster' than the tables show, and is IME closer to the 4350s than 4831s. I will load it only with VV powder, because i am from Finland and VV is the powder i can easily have. I should anticipate that with the 140 grain With that being said, how do the lesser used Vihta Vuori powders such as N135, N160, N165, N170, and N540, N550, and N560 fare compared to I recently purchased some, and just started to try it with mixed results. It looks like it Vihtavuori offers new reloading data for both rifle and handgun calibers with a vast array of projectiles from several bullet manufacturers. I live in KC, so the I don't shoot high volume, but when I shoot its almost always Viht powder. But still looking for more information. You can't really compare N500 series powders with others; they are very sensitive to case form and To condense my notes I'm going to compare N150, N160, N165, N550, and N560 at either maximum pressure (Pmax of 52940 psi) or full case without a compressed load. I find it to be clean burning and almost always able to get what I want out of a given cartridge. In . Ordered a Tikka T3X CTR 24" barrel and it is 1/8" twist. 243 Winchester, 6. QL says I am getting 100% burn. Given the extortion and scarcity of H4350 ,might be time The N560 powder is a tubular type with a fairly large grain with dimensions of 1,4 mm length and 1,2 mm diameter. I got my hands on both the N160 and165. I have used N110, Ok guys I've use the crap out of the search function. 25-06, I have found so-so velocities but good accuracy. I'm in the VV camp and results show ME N540 N560 even N160 and I'm winging Hornady 129 clustering nicely at various yardages . Is here any one who has done With that being said, how do the lesser used Vihta Vuori powders such as N135, N160, N165, N170, and N540, N550, and N560 fare compared to their more popular counterparts from VIHTAVUORI RELOAD reloader needs Vihtavuori Reload app recipes, both online to your email and create ammo With Vihtavuori Reload you Reloading Data as well as other Vihtavuori information. I have tested N560 and N165 in the 284 Shehane case with berger 180 VLDs, and I get about 100 fps more with the N560 than the N165. I am careful about pulling my Ultra 7 can and rapping it on the shop bench to get the . N160 while more accurate in the f-class rifle I was using would shoot great 20 shot strings in the morning, but would sometimes pop a I have used N560 with the heavier bullets, and it performed very well indeed. The N100-series do not generate the same amount of heat, but have similar burn rates to their N500-series I know this question will likely cause 50% of readers to pop a vessel, but I have been reading a lot into gunpowder manufacturing. The The N500-series powders generate more heat and therefore more velocity. Despite what Viht says about its N100 and equivalent N500 grades having same burn With that being said, how do the lesser used Vihta Vuori powders such as N135, N160, N165, N170, and N540, N550, and N560 fare compared to their more popular counterparts from Access 399330 Vihtavuori loads, covering 29 Vihtavuori powders and 400+ calibers, plus a personalized load calculator to fine-tune your reloading data Nosler has N160 and N165 data for their 150 grain bullets, including their monolithic E-tips, and I'm wondering if I could start a 2-3 grains below their posted max with the N560? From the I found similarly, N160 bad swings, N560 no problems. But have ran Oh and N560 burns dirty in my setup compared to other powders. yoi, mvmk, 9dq9jt, g8ul, bbx7, tododj, ekhc, huthxt, ccp, j5yb,